BTC/USDT
BTC/USDTLiquidity: nearly level2 : 2
BTC/USDT spread: 0,0129 bps at Bybit versus 0,0030 bps at BitGet. The gap is within noise, so there is no winner here.
Volume, order book and open interest come from exchange APIs and aggregators and are averaged, so one lucky day decides nothing. With comparable liquidity, an order of the same size fills on both venues at roughly the same price.
Fees: Bybit is cheaperBybit 2 : 1
USDT withdrawal (ERC20): 0,8 USDT at Bybit versus 2 USDT at BitGet. Also USDT withdrawal (TRC20): 1,3 USDT at Bybit versus 1,5 USDT at BitGet.
Spot maker and taker fees are the base tier without discounts, taken from exchange fee pages. USDT withdrawal fees refresh from exchange APIs every 6 hours; if an exchange does not publish them without an API key, the row is skipped. Active traders care about maker and taker, occasional transfers care about the withdrawal fee.
Assets: more at BitGetBitGet 2 : 0
Trading pairs: 3 478 at BitGet versus 527 at Bybit. Also Coins listed: 514 at BitGet versus 397 at Bybit.
Active trading pairs are counted from the instrument lists of the exchanges themselves where they publish them, coin counts come from CoinGecko, supported networks from the Kurslog catalog. More coins means a wider choice of altcoins; more pairs makes cross trading possible without an intermediate swap.
Reliability: both stable1 : 1
Verified reserves: $15.91B at Bybit versus $6.24B at BitGet. Both exchanges pass our monitoring without a meaningful gap.
Uptime is measured over 30 days of Kurslog monitoring with a check every 15 minutes, founding year and proof of reserves come from the catalog, trust score from CoinGecko. A one-year gap or 0.2% of uptime counts as a tie.
Community: Bybit is more active on KurslogBybit 1 : 0
Reviews on Kurslog: 3 at Bybit versus 2 at BitGet.
These are verified reviews from Kurslog users: nothing gets here without moderation. A rating built on a handful of reviews is fragile and a few new ones can move it, so look at what people write, not only at the average.
Languages and features: the same set0 : 0
P2P with local currencies: Yes at Bybit versus Yes at BitGet. Feature-wise the exchanges do not differ. Also Copy trading: Yes at Bybit versus Yes at BitGet.
P2P with local currencies, copy trading and the number of interface languages are entered into the Kurslog catalog manually from official exchange pages. Mandatory verification is shown as a fact without a winner: for some it is protection, for others an extra step.
Bottom line
The sections are split evenly: Bybit takes fees, community, BitGet takes assets.
Market metrics refresh automatically, so the score can shift over time. Choose by the sections that matter to you.
Bybit is my favorite for earning extra with staking and earn products. Lots of options for passive income, and the interface is user-friendly. Withdrawals are smooth, no hassles so far!
All reviews of Bybit →Bitget is awesome! Been trading there for half a year now, love the bonuses they give out for futures trading. Withdrawals are super fast, no big issues. Only once had a small delay but support fixed it real quick. Highly recomend it to anyone getting into crypto!
All reviews of BitGet →
Equal number of wins, see the sections above.
Open an accountBybit review →
Better on: usdt withdrawal (bep20), trading pairs, btc/usdt spread.
Open an accountBitGet review →Spread, order book depth and pair volume come straight from public exchange APIs every 10 minutes and are averaged over 7 days; USDT withdrawal fees come from exchange APIs every 6 hours; uptime from Kurslog monitoring; exchange volume, trust score and coin count from CoinGecko; fee tiers, languages and features are entered manually from official exchange pages. The winner of each metric is calculated, not editorially chosen. This is not investment advice.