Hyperliquid or dYdX V4: which to choose in 2026

Hyperliquid wins 4 of 7 metrics, dYdX V4 wins 1, and 1 are a tie. The biggest edge of Hyperliquid: Trading and liquidity.

Score by section
Trading and liquidity
3 : 0
Assets
1 : 1
Reliability
0 : 0
Profile across 3 areas · 7 metrics

Hyperliquid leads in trading and liquidity, dYdX V4 wins none

HyperliquiddYdX V4
  • Trading and liquidity: Hyperliquid leads 3 : 0
  • Assets: level, 0 metrics without a winner
  • Reliability: level, 1 metrics without a winner

Live BTC market, perpetual contracts

from exchange APIsupdated 05:07 AM · refreshed hourly
BTC
$81 248,00mark price
Open Interest
$3.56B
24h volume
$1.95B
Funding
0,0013 %
Funding, annualized
10,9 %
Open Interest
Volume×384,4higher on Hyperliquid
BTC-USD
$81 172,72mark price
Open Interest
24h volume
$5M
Funding
0,0000 %
Funding, annualized
0,0 %

Liquidity: Hyperliquid leadsHyperliquid 3 : 0

Open Interest
Hyperliquid$16.87B
dYdX V4$55.3M
24h volume
Hyperliquid$6.95B
dYdX V4$42.5M

Open Interest at Hyperliquid is $16.87B versus $55.3M at dYdX V4. Also 24h volume: $6.95B at Hyperliquid versus $42.5M at dYdX V4.

Volume, order book and open interest come from exchange APIs and aggregators and are averaged, so one lucky day decides nothing. For a purchase of a few hundred dollars the difference is invisible, but a large order fills at market depth: the more liquidity, the less is lost to slippage.

Assets: level1 : 1

Perpetual markets
Hyperliquid411
dYdX V4119
Supported networks
Hyperliquid0
dYdX V41

Perpetual markets: 411 at Hyperliquid versus 119 at dYdX V4. Both exchanges offer roughly the same choice.

Active trading pairs are counted from the instrument lists of the exchanges themselves where they publish them, coin counts come from CoinGecko. If you need a specific coin, check its availability on each venue separately.

Reliability: both stable0 : 0

30-day uptime
Hyperliquid99,9 %
dYdX V499,8 %

30-day uptime: 99,9 % at Hyperliquid versus 99,8 % at dYdX V4. Both exchanges pass our monitoring without a meaningful gap.

Uptime is measured over 30 days of Kurslog monitoring with a check every 15 minutes, founding year and proof of reserves come from the catalog, trust score from CoinGecko. A one-year gap or 0.2% of uptime counts as a tie.

Bottom line

Hyperliquid leads in 1 of 3 sections: trading and liquidity. dYdX V4 does not win a single section.

Market metrics refresh automatically, so the score can shift over time. Choose by the sections that matter to you.

Latest review of Hyperliquid

There are no reviews of Hyperliquid on Kurslog yet. Yours could be the first.

All reviews of Hyperliquid
Latest review of dYdX V4

There are no reviews of dYdX V4 on Kurslog yet. Yours could be the first.

All reviews of dYdX V4
Comparison leader · 4 : 1Open an account at Hyperliquid

Ahead on: open interest, 24h volume, perpetual markets.

Open an accountHyperliquid review
AlternativeOpen an account at dYdX V4

Better on: supported networks.

Open an accountdYdX V4 review

Spread, order book depth and pair volume come straight from public exchange APIs every 10 minutes and are averaged over 7 days; USDT withdrawal fees come from exchange APIs every 6 hours; uptime from Kurslog monitoring; exchange volume, trust score and coin count from CoinGecko; fee tiers, languages and features are entered manually from official exchange pages. The winner of each metric is calculated, not editorially chosen. This is not investment advice.

Hyperliquid or dYdX V4: comparison | Kurslog