Kraken's parent company, Payward, posted $508 million in adjusted revenue for the second quarter of 2026. That is 17% higher than the same period last year.
The figure stands out because it grew even as trading volume fell 13%, to $310 billion. Clients traded less, yet the company earned more.
The user base is growing faster than trading activity
Payward's funded accounts rose 42% during the quarter, to 6.6 million. Based on that growth rate, the figure a year earlier was roughly 4.6 million.
In under 12 months, the company added around 2 million new clients. At the same time, trading volume per user dropped on average. More people are trading smaller amounts, or trading less often.
Part of the client growth comes from a broader product lineup. Over the past year, Kraken added stock and ETF trading for US users and expanded into prediction markets. Crypto remains the core of the business, but it is no longer the only reason someone opens an account.
Fewer trades, but more revenue
The gap between rising revenue and falling volume comes down to how the company earns money. Trading fees remain the core of the business, but other sources, such as staking, paid subscriptions and corporate services, are growing faster than fees.
Such products depend less on crypto price swings. A client keeps paying for a subscription or holding staked assets even during months without a single trade.
Diversification is offsetting weaker trader activity
Payward's report states that a growing share of revenue no longer comes from direct asset trading. The business used to rely on fees for buying and selling crypto, including Bitcoin and Ethereum. Staking, paid subscription tiers and institutional services now add to that base.
Retail trading is cooling while institutional money enters through ETFs
The drop in Kraken's trading volume fits a broader market pattern. Retail traders are trading more cautiously, while large institutional players are building positions indirectly, through exchange-traded funds.
According to Q2 ownership disclosures, Swiss bank UBS increased its bitcoin ETF call options 24-fold. Morgan Stanley raised its stake in BlackRock's bitcoin ETF by 23%. JPMorgan also expanded its bitcoin and ether ETF positions.
The money is not leaving the market. It is simply changing route: fewer direct trades on exchanges like Kraken, more indirect exposure through regulated funds built for institutions.
Earnings season showed diverging paths for exchanges
The second quarter of 2026 was uneven for the crypto market's biggest players. Coinbase posted a $359 million loss despite record market share. Bullish reported a $280 million loss, though its stock jumped 14% afterward. Gemini took a $107.7 million loss even as revenue grew 37%.
That fits a broader 2026 pattern. Exchanges that once relied solely on trading fees are hunting for new revenue streams to get through stretches of weaker trader activity.
By comparison, Payward's result looks like an exception. The company stayed profitable in a quarter when several rivals booked losses tied to one-off costs or lawsuits.
Does this strengthen the case for a Kraken IPO
According to earlier reports, Kraken's leadership has weighed a public listing for several years. The company has never given an official date for going public.
Steady growth in both revenue and users during a weaker market could add weight to that case. But one strong quarter is rarely enough to convince investors a business model holds up long term.
What could complicate this model in coming quarters
- New accounts do not guarantee new activity. Some may sit dormant for months.
- Dependence on market mood: a prolonged price slump could cool interest in staking and subscriptions too.
- Competition among centralized exchanges is intensifying, and some clients switch platforms to chase lower fees.
- Regulatory costs: new requirements in the US and EU could rise faster than the company's revenue.
Diversification worked, but it may not last
For the quarter, Payward showed a business can keep growing even as trader activity cools. The main driver was expanding revenue beyond trading fees.
Still, the trend is fragile. If new account growth slows and trading volume fails to recover, diversification alone may not be enough to sustain the same pace of revenue growth.
The next report will show whether this model holds up or was a one-off effect from new product launches. Until then, the second-quarter numbers stand as a strong, but isolated, argument in Payward's favor.




Comments
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *